Re: [ic] Performance of mysql versus postgressql

["Jay Flaherty" <fty@mediapulse.com>]

> Message: 12
> From: "Mike Clark" <mclark7@triad.rr.com>
> To: <interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [ic] Performance of mysql versus postgressql
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:54:33 -0500
> Reply-To: interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com

> Also be aware that Postgres' strength lies in scalability as you load
your
> server. MySQL is quite likely to be faster under single-user or light
loads.

I beg to differ. mySQL is quite likely to be faster under all
conditions. We run mySQL on a dozen databases anywhere from 1,000
records up to 2.5M records and anywhere from 10 to 100's of transactions
per second. All on the same machine and daemon. Most of these run from
various web servers with no effect on page loads. Postgres' strength
lies in being a "Object-Relational DBMS, supporting almost all SQL
constructs, including subselects, transactions, and user-defined types
and functions.". Because of this it is not as lean and mean as mySQL is.
Check out:
http://www.mysql.com/information/benchmark-results/result-mysql,pg.html 

_______________________________________________
interchange-users mailing list
interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com
http://interchange.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users