[ic] bug in 4.0.4a "sub log" ?
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 08:50:26 +0000
Bill Randle wrote:
> It would appear to me you're barking up the wrong tree and that [log] is
> working exactly as it is supposed to. Use "hide=1" if you don't want to
> see the status.
Good, I'd much rather be barking up the wrong tree than fighting a bug anyway of
Anyhow found this out last night independently while I was ready the source code
over coco before bed.
(And don't think this will stop me next time I think something might be wrong,
I'll just do more checking first :-) )
\__/ Murray Gibbins email@example.com
/ \ Programmer
_ \__/ _ ================================================
\\ || // Scotweb Limited, firstname.lastname@example.org
\\||// 13a Albert Terrace, http://www.scotweb.ltd.uk
\||/ Edinburgh EH10 5EA Tel: +44 (0) 131 270 82 33
|| Scotland. Europe. Fax: +44 (0) 7020 93 49 04