[ic] postgres vs mysql
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:32:36 -0600
After reading the PostgreSQL docs again (link below) I realized the author
may be writing in a biased tone. Check it out.....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Heins" <email@example.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: [ic] postgres vs mysql
> Quoting Ragen Herrington (firstname.lastname@example.org):
> > Troy,
> > If I remember correctly, mySQL is a duplicated effort related to
> > That being said, mySQL will be discontinued at some point in time.
> > Hopefully this tidbit will help your decision.
> I certainly haven't heard this. MySQL is alive and kicking, and there
> are certainly no plans to discontinue it that I have heard.
> I wonder if you were thinking of miniSQL, which has been struggling.
> Supposedly it revived as of Jan 1 (see http://www.hughes.com.au).
> I was down on Postgres for speed reasons at one time, but V7.0x
> has *greatly* improved speed, to the point where some people say
> it is faster than MySQL. I wouldn't have believed that until I tried
> 7.0x just yesterday. The several seconds it used to take to import
> only a few hundred records (the country table) now are not appreciably
> diffrent from the blink of an eye MySQL takes.
> Akopia, Inc., 131 Willow Lane, Floor 2, Oxford, OH 45056
> phone +1.513.523.7621 fax 7501 <email@example.com>
> Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing.
> -- Wernher Von Braun
> Interchange-users mailing list