[ic] postgres vs mysql (fwd)
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:08:25 -0800
sorry mike, did'nt realize I was opening such a big can of worms. Only
reason I posted it here, was because it would be relevant to how I handled
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Heins" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Thursday, 18 January, 2001 13:41
Subject: Re: [ic] postgres vs mysql (fwd)
> Quoting Kaare Rasmussen (email@example.com):
> > > We now return you to your regular advocacy threads already in
> > Talk about biaz.
> > Maybe you like MySQL better, Mike. Of course you're entitled to do that.
> > But I try at least to give some information where Widenius is not
> > therefore giving wrong information.
> I didn't reply to your rebuttal of my statement, because it didn't relate
> to Interchange.
> If you think I am greatly biased, that is certainly your right.
> I guess at least that part might relate to Interchange. 8-)
> I don't think I am -- I have spent a great deal of effort designing an
> application which is not biased toward any specific database. In other
> words, I am telling you I am not greatly biased and that I have spent
> thousands of hours trying to prove that. You can take it for what you
> think it is worth, as can everyone.
> You got your chance to post, as did Monty and some others. I am simply
> saying that when the topic excludes Interchange, it no longer belongs
> on this list. There are plenty of forums for Postgres vs. Mysql.
> Akopia, Inc., 131 Willow Lane, Floor 2, Oxford, OH 45056
> phone +1.513.523.7621 fax 7501 <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed. -- Francis Bacon
> Interchange-users mailing list
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.226 / Virus Database: 108 - Release Date: 1/5/2001