[ic] Settling AuthorizeNet (old Mike Heins post)

Jon Jensen interchange-users@icdevgroup.org
Thu Dec 5 17:32:00 2002


On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Mike Heins wrote:

> > [snip]
> > 
> > Is anyone actually using the "settle" type? I hesitate to remap it,
> > but I am doing an improved order_status.html page which will optionally
> > capture transactions previously done with AUTH_ONLY. I would like it
> > to be payment-gateway independent, and cannot use "PRIOR_AUTH_CAPTURE"
> > as the mode for that reason. My only other alternative is to create yet
> > another mode, i.e. "settle_prior", and then update all payment modules
> > to accept that (and map it to their own probably-properly-mapped settle
> > mode).
> > 
> > [/snip]
> > 
> > I came across this post that was from a couple of months ago
> > and was surprised no one replied to it.
[snip]
> > I don't know about everyone else, but I for one would love for
> > some more work to be done in this area, since my experience in 
> > this matter is quite limited.
> > 
> > This is a definite go for me, so Mike, if need be, contact me about
> > even consulting with you to get this completed then it can get 
> > implemented for everyone.
> 
> It is actually completed, and is proven to work with at least
> AuthorizeNet. It is a part of 4.9.4, and does voids as well as
> settles from the status update page. The live demo has it in
> (using Vend::Payment::TestPayment).

We're using auth, delayed capture, settle, and void with Verisign, and 
it's working well.

Jon