[ic] "&" vs. "&" -- correct html links with interchange

[interchange-users@icdevgroup.org]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Walsh" <kevin@cursor.biz>
To: <interchange-users@icdevgroup.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 8:37 PM
Subject: RE: [ic] "&" vs. "&amp;" -- correct html links with
interchange


> uhwduhwd@hotmail.com wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to validate the interchange generated webpages. But
there is
> > a
> >
> > Problem:
> >
> > The ampersand is nor correct. Within links it is important to have
it
> > as &amp; - but interchange provides only an &
> >
> > Example:
> >
> >
http://some.domain.com/cgi-bin/foundation/index.html?id=Tf8wEUwW&mv_pc=
> > 356
> >
> > is not valid, it must be:
> >
> >
http://some.domain.com/cgi-bin/foundation/index.html?id=Tf8wEUwW&amp;mv
> > _pc=356
> >
> > that is valid.
> >
> >
> > Somebody knows to fix this in Interchange. I use Interchange 4.8.5
> >
> You have been misinformed.  The problem only exists in the mind of
> your webpage validator.
>
> If "&" is to be the URI separator then "&" cannot be specified as
> "&amp;".  You may specify your own URI argument separator with the
> following interchange.cfg directive:
>
>     UrlSepChar :
>
> The above specifies that ":" should be used instead of "&", which is
> what I use myself.
>
> --
>    _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
>   _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/   K e v i n   W a l s
h
>  _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/    kevin@cursor.biz
> _/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/
>
> _______________________________________________
> interchange-users mailing list
> interchange-users@icdevgroup.org
> http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
>

Whatever, this solution is great and it works fine!

Thank You

Uwe Disch