[ic] Documentation

[Scott Underwood]

Racke,
	The last part of the email is a legitimate question, which I would 
like to know myself. I'm pretty handy with Interchange and I've been able 
to stumble through and learn alot, however good documentation would be 
nice to have at your side. I was worried that the documentation sold by 
redhat is a rehash of what's already online. I will always spend money on 
good documentation, but it must be good documentation. All the work done 
for us by the many people who do the work on IC is always appreciated.

On 25 Jan 2002, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote:

> Jurgen Botz <jurgen@botz.org> writes:
> 
> > The documentation has some obvious gaps.  A bit of historic searching shows
> > that these have been there for a while without getting fixed... with free
> > software that can be expected, or rather, the user can't expect it to be
> > fixed unless they do it.  But IC isn't just free software it's /also/ a
> > RedHat supported product.  Would I get more complete documentation from
> > RedHat?  Is the printed doc RedHat sells more complete?
> 
> Please be aware that emails of these kinds tend to be ignored. People
> are bitching all the times about the documentation of Interchange, but
> only a very small set of people are actually working on it.
> And these guys are usually very busy with doing their work and
> Interchange development at all.
> 
> Ciao
>         Racke
> 
> 

-- 
Scott Underwood

"-- challenging authority and insisting that it justify itself -- 
    are appropriate at all levels."

	--Noam Chomsky