[ic] Random GPG failures

[Brian Kosick]

I guess I spoke too soon, but at least it's much less frequent now.  Since 
last Friday, 05/31/2002.  I have gotten one PGP encryption error.
 From the log file:

process.html PGP failed with status 131072:

At 10:54 AM 6/3/02 -0400, you wrote:
>Just to let every one know, this fix has indeed cured my GPG woes, at 
>least so far, the site went all weekend without a single one.  Quite an 
>improvement verses 2-3 everyday.  A few things that I noticed about the 
>new conf.  IC seems to take twice as much memory as before, the new 
>process's are around 30-40MB/process, whereas previously they were 
>~20MB/process.  Also, they seem to place less of a load on the CPU when 
>they run.
>
>At 03:10 PM 5/31/02 -0400, you wrote:
>>At 01:02 PM 5/31/02 -0600, you wrote:
>>> > >Hi,
>>> > >
>>> > >I had somewhat a similar problem, and went nut.  After posting on
>>> > >Interchange, I kindly got a response from Kevin Walsh, who
>>> > pointed me to
>>> > >the following article.  I resolved my issue:
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >http://interchange.redhat.com/pipermail/interchange-users/200-March/018 
>>> 636.
>>>html
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >Thanks Tin and Dan,
>>> >
>>> >         I've implemented the RPC traffic mode, and the MaxServer 0
>>> >suggestions.  More specifically, I followed the articles solution.  (I
>>> >liked the ifdef solution)  I'll watch to see if there are any more errors,
>>> >and let everyone know if this has been resolved.
>>>
>>>I just implemented it as well, but there is already and ifdef TRAFFIC
>>>section of the code so you shouldn't have to add one.  Not sure the effect
>>>if you do either.  Just do a search from the top for TRAFFIC.  You will find
>>>a line that says Variable TRAFFIC low (which you change from low to rpc) and
>>>then the ifdef for "low" followed by one for "rpc".  Just add the MaxServers
>>>0
>>>line to the bottom of that ifdef section.
>>>
>>>By the way, doing an interchange -r every night reduces the frequency a lot
>>>but does NOT solve the problem, as I had posted earlier.  Several days after
>>>that post, it happened again.
>>>
>>>Patrick
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>interchange-users mailing list
>>>interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com
>>>http://interchange.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>interchange-users mailing list
>>>interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com
>>>http://interchange.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
>>
>>Oops Thanks for pointing that out, I removed the dup entry, and added 
>>MaxServers to the appropriate place....
>>
>>
>>
>>Brian Kosick
>>Web Programmer
>>New Age Consulting Service, Inc.
>>216-619-2000
>>briank@nacs.net
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>interchange-users mailing list
>>interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com
>>http://interchange.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
>
>Brian Kosick
>Web Programmer
>New Age Consulting Service, Inc.
>216-619-2000
>briank@nacs.net
>
>_______________________________________________
>interchange-users mailing list
>interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com
>http://interchange.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users

Brian Kosick
Web Programmer
New Age Consulting Service, Inc.
216-619-2000
briank@nacs.net