[ic] Interchange version ?

[Schuyler Langdon]

> Quoting Schuyler Langdon (icdevlist@gatordev.com):
> > > I am using 4.9.7 without problems. I think you need to evaluate the
> > scenario
> > > where you are going to implement interchange. Mine, on the other hand,
is
> > a LAN
> > > with not shipping nor prices requirements. Therefore, I decided to use
the
> > > unstable version, which looks better, but at the same time, can be
> > unstable.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Diego
> > >
> > > > What is the recommended version of interchange to use for a
e-commerce
> > site?
> > > > I am not on this mailing list, so please respond to the return
address
> > > > given.
> > > >
> >
> > For a real business application, I would recommend the stable release
over
> > the current release. I ran through the latest demo recently and the
parts of
> > the admin manual order placement did work as expected. This was the only
> > functionality I looked at but I imagine with the current revamp there
would
> > be other inconsistancies as well.
> >
>
> And I would recommend the opposite. If you are developing now and use
> 4.8, you will be developing with outdated and unsupported code.
>
> WRT the functionality of the new order stuff, it requires a new
> catalog order routing to work totally. It is *supposed* to work
> with the old foundation, but assuredly if you have done custom
> log_transaction or log_entry it may not.
>
> --
> Mike Heins
> Perusion -- Expert Interchange Consulting    http://www.perusion.com/
> phone +1.513.523.7621      <mike@perusion.com>
>
> Experience is what allows you to recognize a mistake the second
> time you make it. -- unknown
> _______________________________________________
> interchange-users mailing list
> interchange-users@icdevgroup.org
> http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
>

So the stable version is "outdated and unsupported" and the current version
is not the stable version. What a conundrum!!

Schuyler Langdon
GatorDev.com