[ic] sql query with UNION broken
jon at endpoint.com
Fri Aug 22 16:04:23 EDT 2003
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Kevin Walsh wrote:
> The second correction is better, in my opinion. There is only one
> SELECT statement, while there are loads of statements that would need
> $update to be set.
> I suggest a minor correction to your second proposal, as follows:
> $update = 1 if $query !~ /^[\s\W]*select\s+/i;
> That would allow multiple opening parentheses (with or without
> whitespace between) before the SELECT.
That's a good idea. I'll commit that unless someone sees problems with it.
More information about the interchange-users