[ic] Re: Automated Reply from <email@example.com>
bill at ries-knight.net
Tue Feb 17 23:59:14 EST 2004
a bad autoresponder filter on the interchange mail list.
Due to the 100 plus spams I get daily, I have an autoresponse set up. It is
a limitation of the mail server not to ignore certain addies when auto
If it is a problem, I will pull from the list.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Bill Ries-Knight *** Stockton, CA.
My views on spamand SCO
Sending UCE is like screwing in church during the sermon.
If you are noticed you are shunned for the rest of your days.
----- Original Message -----
From: "TIff" <tiff at fightclub.com>
To: <bill at www.ries-knight.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 7:22 PM
Subject: RE: Automated Reply from <bill at www.ries-knight.net>
> I don't know who you are or why you have emailed me, but please do not
> any correspondance here again.
> Thank you
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bill at www.ries-knight.net [mailto:bill at www.ries-knight.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 6:41 PM
> To: interchange-users at icdevgroup.org; tiff at fightclub.com
> Subject: Automated Reply from <bill at www.ries-knight.net>
> Thank you for your email.
> We shall reply to you
> as soon as possible.
> If the mail you are sending is not verified as going to a vaild email
> account or is otherwise determined to be UCE or spam, be advised we will
> for relief in court under any statute that may apply.
> Views on spam, vindicated by a new law in California.
> Sending UCE is like screwing in church during the sermon.
> If you are noticed you are shunned for the rest of your days.
More information about the interchange-users