emailgrant123b at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 20 19:53:07 EST 2004
--- Kevin Walsh <kevin at cursor.biz> wrote:
> Jon [prtyof5 at attglobal.net] wrote:
> > > > RobotIP <<EOR
> > > > 220.127.116.11, 18.104.22.168,
> > > > 22.214.171.124, 126.96.36.199,
> > > > 188.8.131.52, 184.108.40.206,
> > > > 220.127.116.11?, 18.104.22.168,
> > > > EOR
> > > >
> > > > Seems like there should be some 64.68*
> > > > in there shouldn't there ??
> > > >
> > > Please be so kind to tell us which robots
> crawling from this IP block
> > > to help the ICDEVGROUP to improve the default
> > >
> > Googlebot. Or am I wrong ? Assuming so would it
> be correct
> > and appropriate to add 64.68? ??
> 64.68.* would cover 65,536 IP addresses. It's
> probably safe to say
> that they're not all used by spiders. They're
> definitely not all
> owned by Google. :-)
> For instance, 22.214.171.124/19 is allocated to by "Elan
> 126.96.36.199/19 is allocated to "Advanced Access" and
> is allocated to "Cable & Wireless". Within the
> Cable & Wireless
> block, 188.8.131.52/23 is reallocated (sub-let) to
> eBay. I believe
> Google has a large block in there somewhere
> (something like 2048 IPs)
> but I can't find it at the moment, and they're
> probably not all used
> by spiders anyway.
> A more focused list of addresses may make it into
> the default set,
> as long as a proper justification is presented.
> You're free to add
> any addresses you like into your own local
> configuration, of course.
Why would you want to use IPs instead of UAs?
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
More information about the interchange-users