[ic] OT: Redhat Alternatives?
jon at endpoint.com
Sat Jan 10 19:20:02 EST 2004
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, cbcurrier wrote:
> Redhat has an open source still ... Called Fedora
> Goto fedora.redhat.com
> It is based on rh 9.0 & has already evolved but then redhat is not
> really supporting it only hosting an opensource linux for the public.
> As for working with IC There are so many issues regarding the new 5.0.0
> that I even wonder if anyone has ventured forth to this level?
Huh? What "issues" are there regarding 5.0.0? Many of us have been using
4.9.x and 5.0.0 with no problems. That's why we decided to make it the new
stable release. :)
> But I suspect that it Should work fine out of the box. So Consider the
> Fedora version as an alternative...
Suspecting is not going to help anyone much ... especially as your
supposition is incorrect. Interchange does not work with Fedora's stock
Perl. That's already been discussed in this forum several times. Someday
there's likely to be distro Perl/IC harmony again, but until then you
should compile your own nonthreaded Perl in /usr/local.
More information about the interchange-users