docelic at mail.inet.hr
Mon Apr 3 12:54:11 EDT 2006
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:54:38 -0600 (MDT)
Jon Jensen <jon at endpoint.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Davor Ocelic wrote:
> >> I think the docs list is about to be opened up. It's original use was
> >> not for docs discussions, but for docs-specific CVS commit notices.
> >> It's only recently that a few discussion threads have popped up in there.
> >> Perhaps we could start a new (public) "interchange-docs" mail list for
> >> documentation discussion and submissions, and keep the current "docs"
> >> list for CVS commit notices only (no posting, and the "Reply-To" header
> >> set to direct followups to interchange-docs).
> >> The interchange-users list will suffice as a public docs discussion area
> >> in the mean time.
> > Since I am the only one doing commits, I don't think separation to two lists
> > is justified. Especially since there isn't many subscribers either.
> One aspect I like about Kevin's suggestion here is that the name
> interchange-docs fits in with the rest of our mailing lists which all
> start with interchange-. In fact, it wouldn't be bad to rename "docs" to
> interchange-docs-cvs, IMO.
Well, I'm just plugging-in in the existing infrastructure. One thing I
already did weeks ago, was changing visible prefix from [docs] to
[interchange-docs] to be more in style.
Ok, anyway, I'll see what would it take to rename a mailman list, and let
you all know.
More information about the interchange-users