[ic] "High traffic list" - ramblings on Interchange

[Sebastian Kliess]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: interchange-users-bounces at icdevgroup.org 
> [mailto:interchange-users-bounces at icdevgroup.org] On Behalf 
> Of Andreas Grau
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 11:15 AM
> To: interchange-users at icdevgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [ic] "High traffic list" - ramblings on Interchange
> 
> 
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:58:55 +0100
> "Sebastian Kliess" <sebastian.kliess at mbs-medical.de> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: interchange-users-bounces at icdevgroup.org
> > > [mailto:interchange-users-bounces at icdevgroup.org] On Behalf 
> > > Of Andreas Grau
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 9:04 AM
> > > To: interchange-users at icdevgroup.org
> > > Subject: [ic] "High traffic list" - ramblings on Interchange
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Next, IC is largely unsupported. If you look in the mailing
> > > list archives, there are tons of serious questions which 
> > > remain without answer. The other IRC channel is mostly dead.
> > > 
> > 
> > we are running IC since 2 years without any downtime and we have 
> > really no open questions - the only open questions I know are silly
> 
> Downtime was not a point in my statement, as far as I 
> remember. I never questioned the quality of the software.
> 
> I have quickly checked the archives: You seem to have never 
> posted a question, and never seem to have answered one. The 
> former is good for you (you were never disappointed), the 
> latter bad for the others - especially when considering that 
> you must have a great know-how regarding IC.
> 

What's the problem? All issues are closed! 

> 
> > 
> > > Take an unsupportive mailing list plus zero docs, and you
> > > come to think that IC is actually a closed-shop solution.
> > > 
> > 
> > maybe the problem is that you compare IC with "shops", for 
> us it is a 
> > professional application server (and I know Microsoft 
> Commerce Server, 
> > Websphere, Vignette, Notes, ...)
> 
> Maybe the problem is that you read "shop" when I write 
> "closed-shop". You may want to check wikipedia on this. 
> Actually it means that you have to be a member of an 
> organisation to participate or benefit.

Sorry about my misunderstanding. I didn't know that "closed-shop" is a fixed
term. 

Cheers, Sebastian