[ic] Risks of websites served from Subversion or CVS checkouts
mike at perusion.com
Wed Aug 20 03:57:40 UTC 2008
Quoting Jon Jensen (jon at endpoint.com):
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Peter wrote:
> >> If you use Subversion or CVS on any project, I recommend you look into how
> >> your files are being served and see if there's anything being exposed.
> > Just a side note, that this is bad practice anyways.
> A matter of opinion, and I disagree.
> > You should maintain your CVS, SVN, GIT, etc repositories separately from
> > your running copy of IC. It is a good idea to use the standard, perl
> > Makefile.PL, make, make test, make install method to install your
> > running copy of IC (as well as other programs) as this method does not
> > copy the CVS, SVN, etc directories anyways, plus it checks certain
> > system dependencies and sets variables, etc.
> I think Perl's ExtUtils::MakeMaker (Makefile.PL) is a terrible way to roll
> out a complex Interchange site comprised of Interchange, admin, catalog
> ("migration") files, etc.
> Version control systems have worked quite well at this for me. They also
> provide a sane way to deal with any intentional or unintentional changes
> made in production (such as mv_metadata.asc, page edits by administrative
> users, shipping.asc, etc.) and provide a way to do code rollouts.
We could easily set $relpat = qr/(\.\.|\.svn|CVS)/ in Vend::File
to ignore CVS/Subversion directories.
Perusion -- Expert Interchange Consulting http://www.perusion.com/
phone +1.765.647.1295 tollfree 800-949-1889 <mike at perusion.com>
Prove you aren't stupid. Say NO to Passport.
More information about the interchange-users