[ic] Encode Woes

[Stefan Hornburg (Racke)]

David Christensen wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2009, at 10:59 AM, Gert van der Spoel wrote:
> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: interchange-users-bounces at icdevgroup.org [mailto:interchange-
>>> users-bounces at icdevgroup.org] On Behalf Of David Christensen
>>> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 4:58 PM
>>> To: interchange-users at icdevgroup.org
>>> Subject: Re: [ic] Encode Woes
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 28, 2009, at 6:08 AM, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> even with current software I get encode errors as fllows:
>>>>
>>>> 89.182.95.158 yar5ToG2:ulisses ulisses [28/August/2009:13:05:48
>>>> +0200] ulisses ulisses.icdev.de/cgi-bin/ulisses/index Safe: Attempt
>>>> to reload Encode.pm aborted.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at /home/interchange/perl/lib/5.10.1/
>>>>> x86_64-linux/Encode/Alias.pm line 22.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> $Variable->{SKU} = 'AEG3203';
>>>>> $Tag->component('image_view_link');
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> This is Perl 5.10.1 from source, compiled without threads and
>>>> Interchange from Git.
>>>>
>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>>
>>> My guess is that this is some specific runtime require that's not
>>> being caught in the Vend::Safe initialization that does the other
>>> Encode/UTF8 stuff.  We may need to figure out what's causing the
>>> delayed load, and if there is something we can do to trigger the
>>> require at Safe setup time.  I haven't looked at 5.10.1 yet, so I may
>>> get a chance to do that today.
>>>
>>> What are the settings you currently have WRT charsets, utf8, etc?
>> And is it for example possible to reduce it to a testcase of maybe a  
>> single
>> tag on a page causing this behavior?
>> I'm running with 5.10.0 , which has an older Encode version (2.33  
>> instead of
>> 2.35), but the differences there do not seem to be very big ...
>>
>> Internet is not coming up with much to hold on to, some checking  
>> done by
>> Perl 5.10 is more strict than 5.8.x ....
>>
>> Do you have a possibility to set up a Perl 5.8.9 as well to see if the
>> problem exists there aswell (with the latest Encode version)?
> 
> 
> As I noted on IRC, 5.10.1 includes a version of Encode.pm which adds  
> an explicit require to a couple routines.  I'm enclosing a patch  
> inline (untested, as I'm still trying to get 5.10.1 to build over  
> here); can you test and verify that this works for you?

No, I get the same error.

Regards
	Racke


-- 
LinuXia Systems => http://www.linuxia.de/
Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration
ICDEVGROUP => http://www.icdevgroup.org/
Interchange Development Team