[ic] Require should mean require

Mike Heins mike at perusion.com
Thu Jun 25 15:09:22 UTC 2009

Quoting Richard Siddall (richard.siddall at elirion.net):
> Jon Jensen wrote:
> > But I would like to discuss making all the Require types die on failure, 
> > rather than just being warnings. It saves a lot of frustration to have 
> > Interchange scream loudly when there's a problem instead of finding out 
> > about it only later when things start to fail mysteriously.
> > 
> > Please comment if you object to such a change.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Jon
> > 
> Wouldn't this mean that if you have 56 customer catalogs running on the 
> same Interchange server, a misconfiguration in any of them would cause 
> all of them to fail to start?
> (True, it's most likely a missing Require in the last catalog you added.)
> I agree that the current behavior is too quiet.

This is the global Require, not the catalog require. (Or so I am assuming.)

Currently the catalog Require does stop the catalog from configuring.

Mike Heins
Perusion -- Expert Interchange Consulting    http://www.perusion.com/
phone +1.765.328.4479  <mike at perusion.com>

Experience is what allows you to recognize a mistake the second time you
make it. -- unknown

More information about the interchange-users mailing list