[ic] include interpolation

[Stefan Hornburg (Racke)]

On 12/06/2010 02:40 PM, Paul Jordan wrote:
>
> In line with my last barrage of emails regarding interpolation... Can
> someone say if it is possible that the interpolation setting (while
> correct in the code) may have been showing as opposite in the docs?
>
> http://docs.icdevgroup.org/cgi-bin/online/tags/include.html
>
> That would be backwards correct?
>
> I'm interested in knowing about the rest of the docs because, while
> after discussing it on list I came to find out that I understood things
> to operate slightly differently (technically), but in practice would
> have vivified in line.
>
> I believe I understood things to operate differently because I
> explicitly remember seeing "interpolate" listed as "yes" almost every
> single time I looked a the docs (circa 2001 - 2003) - and now as you
> know, I am finding the opposite showing in the docs.
>
> I guess I am really wondering if I am losing my mind - only because the
> memories of seeing that are so vivid... almost as vivid as when I
> travelled to Mars with my Velluptian space wife.
>
> Uh ohhh...

Interpolating can only be true for usertags with a body (otherwise there
is simply nothing to interpolate).

Of course the contents of the file are interpolated.

The documentation for [include] could be confusing, so maybe you or someone
else can come up with a better text?

Regards
	Racke


-- 
LinuXia Systems => http://www.linuxia.de/
Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration
ICDEVGROUP => http://www.icdevgroup.org/
Interchange Development Team