[ic] include interpolation

[Paul Jordan]

> From: racke at linuxia.de
> To: interchange-users at icdevgroup.org
> On 12/06/2010 02:40 PM, Paul Jordan wrote:
> >
> > In line with my last barrage of emails regarding interpolation... Can
> > someone say if it is possible that the interpolation setting (while
> > correct in the code) may have been showing as opposite in the docs?
> >
> > http://docs.icdevgroup.org/cgi-bin/online/tags/include.html
> >
> > That would be backwards correct?
> >
> > I'm interested in knowing about the rest of the docs because, while
> > after discussing it on list I came to find out that I understood things
> > to operate slightly differently (technically), but in practice would
> > have vivified in line.
> >
> > I believe I understood things to operate differently because I
> > explicitly remember seeing "interpolate" listed as "yes" almost every
> > single time I looked a the docs (circa 2001 - 2003) - and now as you
> > know, I am finding the opposite showing in the docs.
> >
> > I guess I am really wondering if I am losing my mind - only because the
> > memories of seeing that are so vivid... almost as vivid as when I
> > travelled to Mars with my Velluptian space wife.
> >
> > Uh ohhh...
>
> Interpolating can only be true for usertags with a body (otherwise there
> is simply nothing to interpolate).
>
> Of course the contents of the file are interpolated.
>
> The documentation for [include] could be confusing, so maybe you or someone
> else can come up with a better text?
>
> Regards
> Racke

 
So you are saying "interpolate" defaults to NO on include - that really would confuse me...
 
 
Says No:
http://docs.icdevgroup.org/cgi-bin/online/tags/include.html
 
Says Yes:
http://www.interchange.rtfm.info/icdocs/tags/include.html
 
 
Surely one of those has to be wrong - and I am only referring to the doc itself, not the tag or how it is works.
 
 
Paul