[ic] log_transaction... goto tag with no name or target label?
josh at perusion.net
Mon Jun 20 19:42:00 UTC 2011
On 06/20/2011 02:18 PM, Paul Jordan wrote:
> I was updating my log_transaction with one from, I don't know, 5.6.3 or
> above, and I was noticing that the *goto* tag is used in there, but
> there is no name attribute, nor is there any label in the file.
Not seeing it in the latest source:
> Is there some sort of default behavior for nameless goto tags? The docs
> on devgroup didn't mention anything, and Kevin's docs actually had a
> warning about name/label-less goto's....
Not sure about name-less goto tags, but you should probably remove it,
as it does not appear in even the old versions of this file.
Perusion -- Expert Interchange Consulting http://www.perusion.com/
More information about the interchange-users