[ic] log_transaction... goto tag with no name or target label?
paul at gishnetwork.com
Mon Jun 20 20:12:52 UTC 2011
> From: Mike Heins
> > Quoting Paul Jordan (paul at gishnetwork.com):
> > Hello,
> > I was updating my log_transaction with one from, I don't know, 5.6.3
> > or above, and I was noticing that the *goto* tag is used in there,
> > but there is no name attribute, nor is there any label in the file.
> > Is there some sort of default behavior for nameless goto tags? The
> > docs on devgroup didn't mention anything, and Kevin's docs actually
> > had a warning about name/label-less goto's....
> Without a name, it should just go to the end of the input.
For some reason my emails get caught up in the mail-list's system, so you
may not get this till tomorrow.
I am kinda surprised of your use of the word *should*. Unless I am mistaken,
there are like 6 nameless goto's in the link Josh provided earlier for the
current log_transaction. Months ago I inquired about the ability to use this
tag as you say - is this an expected result, or an observation of a side
I had originally wanted to use goto as if it was a "return;" for the page,
or code being input - and it sounds like I can?
More information about the interchange-users