[ic] Re: [interchange-cvs] interchange - docelic modified 5 files
docelic at mail.inet.hr
Wed Mar 29 13:32:19 EST 2006
> What you call duplication, I call redundancy. And during the process
> of creating a new set of documentation, I would have valued redundancy quite
I would, too, value redundancy. But here we are talking about duplication.
> I haven't changed my opinion too much since last mail exchange here on
> the list: There are the few Interchange developers who don't need the
> documentation, and many others who need them to get going.
> I wanted to understand the [perl] tag. Result :
> This tag does not appear to be affected by, or affect, the rest of Interchange.
> I needed some background on [if] - Not even listed.
> It's simply that I don't understand the priorities of Davor's
> documentation project, as you call it.
And you don't need to understand them (pardon my impatience with you
that has grown really high now).
> > The documentation effort definitely benefits from submissions and input,
> > so don't get me wrong.
> No problem, Racke. And you point is well taken. Only that I don't have
> a very high esteem on how this is done, so count on me for other areas.
Give me a break.
More information about the interchange-users