[ic] Using counter_tid and getting relevant errors, possible?
mike at perusion.com
Sun Mar 12 16:37:13 EST 2006
Quoting Paul Jordan (paul at gishnetwork.com):
> Dear List
> Upon making the change to use a transaction counter as opposed to
> etc/order.number pre-accepted transaction, I followed this:
> Stating to bascially add
> counter_tid etc/transaction.number
> What I have found is that does not work, but instead (as the new distro
> ships) add it to the default route:
> Route default counter_tid logs/tid.counter
> In the what's new file is also a note:
> If you use counter_tid, you *must* set set the
> order number in your logging file if you want
> it to be available.
> I don't know where this refers to.
Look in etc/log_transaction -- search for mv_order_number.
Perusion -- Expert Interchange Consulting http://www.perusion.com/
phone +1.765.647.1295 tollfree 800-949-1889 <mike at perusion.com>
Find the grain of truth in criticism, chew it, and swallow
it. -- anonymous
More information about the interchange-users