[ic] Re: Negative Tax - bug?

Mike Heins mike at perusion.com
Tue Oct 30 21:50:10 EST 2007

Quoting Peter (peter at pajamian.dhs.org):
> It would seem to make sense to me to allow this to be configurable, even
> state-by-state (a column in the state table) so that IC will have the
> ability to better adapt to different tax laws in different areas.

That won't happen, not for the ENTIRE_ORDER scenario we describe.

> I would propose allowing the use of special subs that can be picked from
> the state and/or country tables with a few defaults.  That would allow
> customization for whatever weird taxation laws someone may come across
> (that we don't anticipate).

That makes sense. Indeed, we already have it, as you can put ITL right
in the salestax.asc file, and you can define subroutines via Levies.

Mike Heins
Perusion -- Expert Interchange Consulting    http://www.perusion.com/
phone +1.765.647.1295  tollfree 800-949-1889 <mike at perusion.com>

Find the grain of truth in criticism, chew it, and swallow
it. -- anonymous

More information about the interchange-users mailing list