[ic] Re: Negative Tax - bug?
mike at perusion.com
Tue Oct 30 21:50:10 EST 2007
Quoting Peter (peter at pajamian.dhs.org):
> It would seem to make sense to me to allow this to be configurable, even
> state-by-state (a column in the state table) so that IC will have the
> ability to better adapt to different tax laws in different areas.
That won't happen, not for the ENTIRE_ORDER scenario we describe.
> I would propose allowing the use of special subs that can be picked from
> the state and/or country tables with a few defaults. That would allow
> customization for whatever weird taxation laws someone may come across
> (that we don't anticipate).
That makes sense. Indeed, we already have it, as you can put ITL right
in the salestax.asc file, and you can define subroutines via Levies.
Perusion -- Expert Interchange Consulting http://www.perusion.com/
phone +1.765.647.1295 tollfree 800-949-1889 <mike at perusion.com>
Find the grain of truth in criticism, chew it, and swallow
it. -- anonymous
More information about the interchange-users